Pump.fun self-hosted AMM, can Raydium still monopolize the meme liquidity pool?
Original Author: CryptoBaci, Crypto Researcher
Original Translation: ChatGPT
Editor's Note: This article analyzes Pump.fun's launch of a new AMM challenging Raydium's monopoly position. Pump.fun aims to reduce reliance on Raydium through an independent liquidity pool, potentially causing liquidity outflow and impacting Raydium's market share. The article also discusses the advantages and risks of the new AMM, especially liquidity issues and potential vulnerabilities.
The following is the original content (slightly rephrased for better readability):
Pump.fun has just introduced its own AMM, which may indicate that Pump.fun is no longer relying on Raydium. They have launched their own liquidity pool, and liquidity may begin to shift away from Raydium. This implies:
• Meme coins may no longer need Raydium.
• Pump.fun will keep all fees within its own ecosystem.
• There may be LP rewards (similar to other DEXs).
The first test token $CRACK has been added to the liquidity pool.

So far, all Meme coin liquidity has relied on Raydium. But now:
• You create a token and it can be traded immediately.
• Traders do not need to switch platforms.
• Pump.fun is becoming a fully independent ecosystem.
This may shift the power balance on Solana.

Advantages of the new AMM:
• Instant liquidity without relying on external platforms.
• Fully integrated with Pump.fun.
• Early opportunities for traders → arbitrage and potential system vulnerabilities.
• If this project is successful, it is an early opportunity to enter a new market.

Risks and Drawbacks:
• Still in beta stage → potential vulnerabilities and security risks.
• Liquidity has not reached Raydium's depth yet.
• There is no guarantee that traders will fully migrate to this AMM.
It's either Pump.fun dominates the market share, or this AMM remains niche.

How does this affect $RAY?
Raydium has already felt the pressure. $RAY dropped 10% after the AMM release news. Why?
• If liquidity starts flowing out, Raydium's pool revenues will be impacted.
• Decrease in trading volume = reduced interest in the DEX = further price decline.
• If this trend continues, $RAY could face an even bigger hit.
Raydium is losing control of Solana liquidity.

What to do next?
• Try the new AMM.
• Monitor liquidity and new tokens.
• Continue to observe Raydium's performance—can they defend their position?

You may also like

B.AI partners with MiniMax to launch a limited-time free experience of M3, enabling zero-threshold implementation of Agentic productivity through full-stack infrastructure

The second half of the computing power battle: Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger reveals how AI is reshaping the global semiconductor supply chain

WEEX Live mode: Monitor 20 trading pairs at once and trade like a pro

Morning Report | Secret Network loses $4.67 million due to cross-chain vulnerability; Michael Saylor releases Bitcoin Tracker information again, may disclose increased holdings data next week

Kalshi's biggest competitor is not Polymarket

WEEX Makes Affiliate Access Easier on the Web and in the App

Customize Your Spot Trading Page: Drag Modules and Move the Order Panel Where You Want It

Perp DEX: The Next Generation Exchange "War"

10 Counterintuitive Insights on Latin American Payments

The AI gamble of mining companies: Valuations enter a phase of differentiation, and it's hard to turn the tide

A letter from Alliance to entrepreneurs: Written on the occasion of Cursor selling for 60 billion dollars

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Returns: On-Chain Reinsurance Re Explained | Interview with Re Founder Karan Saroya

The impossible triangle is simply a pseudo problem

Will MicroStrategy fall into a death spiral? What will the macro trend be in the second half of the year?

Blockchain Capital Partner: The Core Secret of Arbitrage

STRC unanchored by 11%, can the perpetual motion machine of Strategy still operate?

Bitcoin Market Analysis 2026: Can BTC Reach $150K by Year-End?

