Renowned Crypto Influencer Embroiled in "Donation Fraudgate," Accused of Faking Hong Kong Fire Donation Receipt, Sparking Public Outcry

By: blockbeats|2026/03/29 09:24:51
0
Share
copy

A serious fire at Wang Fuk House in Tai Po, Hong Kong, has caused hundreds of casualties and property damage. Charitable organizations such as Yan Chai Hospital promptly set up an emergency relief fund to support the affected residents. The cryptocurrency industry has also seen many companies and individuals providing assistance, including industry giants like Binance and Matrixport donating millions of Hong Kong dollars. However, on December 1, a prominent figure in the cryptocurrency community, known as KOL @Elizabethofyou, found herself embroiled in a "Donation Fraud" scandal when the community noticed that the proof of her HK$200,000 donation appeared to be photoshopped.

A "Expose the Fraud" Movement Triggered by a Screenshot

On December 1, Elizabeth, a cryptocurrency influencer with 130,000 followers, posted a tweet on the social media platform X (formerly Twitter), stating that she had donated HK$200,000 to Yan Chai Hospital to support the victims of the Tai Po fire. The tweet included a screenshot of the transaction confirmation and a caption urging others to "show kindness in the face of disaster." The act of kindness quickly garnered over 600,000 views and 1500 likes, initially being seen as a demonstration of positive energy in the industry.

Renowned Crypto Influencer Embroiled in

However, public opinion took a sharp turn within hours. Several members of the crypto community on the Twitter platform, such as @CryptoNyaRu and @abyssofgambling, analyzed the screenshot and pointed out multiple suspicious elements:

1. Irregular Font: The number "2" in the amount "200,000" in the screenshot had a noticeably thinner font, inconsistent with the font style of the "Annual Donation Hotline" number below.

2. Misalignment: The amount line and the text below could not be aligned, showing a significant discrepancy in pixel height typical of image editing software (such as Photoshop) manipulation.

The suspicions quickly escalated, turning the likes into dislikes. The community believed that if this was indeed a fraud, using a significant tragedy to deceive people's compassion was incredibly heinous, and they hoped Elizabeth could provide evidence to prove the authenticity of her donation.

Response from the Involved Party and Escalation of Public Opinion

Faced with overwhelming doubts, Elizabeth released a response video on the evening of the 1st. In the video, she insisted that she had "donated with a clear conscience" and stated that this would be her final response. She then displayed another screenshot as evidence.

This screenshot is different from the first one. The phone number is different, and the video demonstration is of a static webpage without dynamic refreshing. Additionally, netizens believe that the evidence she provided is not convincing as there is no bank transaction record or an official receipt from Renji Hospital.

After releasing a response, Elizabeth ignored numerous requests for self-verification in the comments and continued to post commercial ad tweets. This handling of the situation further enraged the public.

According to the Hong Kong Theft Ordinance, if misleading the public through false statements to gain benefits (including advertising collaboration opportunities due to traffic, brand image enhancement, etc.), it may constitute "fraud" or "obtaining property by deception." Upon conviction for such offenses, the maximum penalty can be 10 to 14 years of imprisonment. Netizens have started reaching out to donation organizations for verification and believe that if the fraudulent donation is confirmed, there should be legal consequences. Some Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs) have also compared donation verification evidence for authenticity. As of now, there has been no latest response from donation organizations regarding Elizabeth.

Historical Warning: The Cost of Celebrity "Donation Fraud"

Using charity for false publicity is not uncommon in the history of public figures.

One of the most famous cases is international actress Zhang Ziyi. During the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake, Zhang Ziyi claimed to donate 1 million RMB. However, in 2010, netizens discovered that the actual amount received was only 840,000 RMB, and the whereabouts of the millions of dollars she claimed to have raised in Cannes were unknown.

After the incident broke out, Zhang Ziyi's public image plummeted, facing an unprecedented crisis of trust. Eventually, her agent apologized for "management negligence," made up the shortfall, and hired an auditing firm to audit and disclose the foundation's accounts. Despite taking remedial measures, the "donation fraud" label followed her for many years.

In 2015, well-known actress Yang Mi promised to donate typewriters and white canes to a special education school in Chengdu while promoting the movie "I Am a Witness." However, it wasn't until 2018 that the school stated they never received the supplies.

Yang Mi's studio explained that it was due to the negligence of an "intermediary" that the donation was not fulfilled, and they promptly donated the supplies and publicly apologized. Although it was not legally classified as fraud, the incident was characterized by the public as "hypocritical," greatly undermining her integrity as a public figure.

-- Price

--

You may also like

Former ByteDance employee's account: How I started with two Pinduoduo hard drives and made six times the profit with Seagate to achieve financial freedom?

A programmer from a big tech company bought hard drives on Pinduoduo and, following clues, managed to accurately capture the sixfold rising stock Seagate using the "finding daily anomalies + 13F institutional verification" framework, making a wild profit of $400,000 and achieving financial freedom.

MiCA reshuffle begins, Binance temporarily bids farewell to the EU

What Binance leaves behind is not scattered retail investors, but a whole batch of high-value users who are forced to liquidate and have almost nowhere to go.

How does Gate redo "buying and selling stocks" from the cryptocurrency world to the stock market?

The competition logic of exchanges has changed.

Visa and Mastercard join 140 giants to launch a new stablecoin, but the impact on the market landscape may still be limited

As an important milestone event in the stablecoin landscape, OUSD is likely to change the existing stablecoin landscape and significantly increase the adoption rate of stablecoins in the global financial system.

Circle CEO responds to OUSD's challenge: Stablecoins are a winner-takes-all business, and we will not slow down

OUSD was jointly launched by more than 140 giants, causing Circle's stock price to plummet in a single day. Circle's CEO personally wrote a response, clarifying USDC's moat from three aspects: network effects, liquidity, and regulation, and dismantling OUSD's three selling points of "free redemption...

Argentina vs Cape Verde: When a Record-Breaking Legend Meets an Unbreakable Underdog

WEEX exclusive pre-match analysis of Argentina vs Cape Verde, exploring Messi-led Argentina’s dominance and Cape Verde’s historic defensive breakout, with a breakdown of volatility, structure, and match dynamics.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more
iconiconiconiconiconiconicon
Customer Support:@weikecs
Business Cooperation:@weikecs
Quant Trading & MM:bd@weex.com
VIP Program:support@weex.com